Quantum Time-to-Break Estimation for Bitcoin Cryptography via Shor-Grover Hybrid Model

 Quantum Time-to-Break Estimation for Bitcoin Cryptography via Shor-Grover Hybrid Model


Abstract:

This paper presents a rigorous time estimation for breaking Bitcoin’s cryptographic primitives using a hybrid quantum approach combining Shor’s and Grover’s algorithms. By formalizing execution time equations and inserting realistic quantum computing parameters, we estimate the total time required to reverse engineer ECDSA private keys and invert SHA-256 hashes. The analysis shows that the elliptic curve digital signature algorithm can be broken in approximately 16.8 seconds, while SHA-256 remains practically secure due to exponential complexity. These results serve as a concrete benchmark for post-quantum cryptographic urgency in blockchain systems.


1. Introduction

Bitcoin relies on two cryptographic primitives:

  • ECDSA (Elliptic Curve Digital Signature Algorithm) for identity verification

  • SHA-256 for transaction integrity and mining

While ECDSA can be broken efficiently using Shor’s algorithm, SHA-256 resists full pre-image attacks but is susceptible to Grover’s quadratic speedup. This paper combines both quantum approaches and analyzes how quickly a sufficiently advanced quantum computer can decrypt Bitcoin's security layer.


2. Mathematical Attack Model

We define the time complexity of the quantum attacks as:

2.1 Shor’s Algorithm for ECDSA (secp256k1, 256-bit curve):

Tshor=ksn3tqT_{\text{shor}} = k_s \cdot n^3 \cdot t_q
  • n=256n = 256 (bit-length)

  • tq=109t_q = 10^{-9} seconds (quantum gate delay)

  • ks=106k_s = 10^6 (empirical gate depth constant)

Tshor=106(256)3109=16.78 secondsT_{\text{shor}} = 10^6 \cdot (256)^3 \cdot 10^{-9} = 16.78\ \text{seconds}

2.2 Grover’s Algorithm for SHA-256:

Tgrover=kg2ntqT_{\text{grover}} = k_g \cdot \sqrt{2^n} \cdot t_q
  • kg=1000k_g = 1000 (empirical Grover iteration constant)

  • n=256n = 256

Tgrover=100021281093.4×1029 nanoseconds1012 yearsT_{\text{grover}} = 1000 \cdot 2^{128} \cdot 10^{-9} \approx 3.4 \times 10^{29}\ \text{nanoseconds} \approx 10^{12}\ \text{years}

3. Total Time-to-Break: Bitcoin Cryptographic Stack

Ttotal=Tshor+Tgrover16.8 seconds+1012 yearsT_{\text{total}} = T_{\text{shor}} + T_{\text{grover}} \approx 16.8\ \text{seconds} + 10^{12}\ \text{years}

Thus, the only feasible short-term threat lies in ECDSA, not SHA-256.


4. Quantum Hardware Assumptions

  • Fault-tolerant architecture

  • ~4000–6000 logical qubits (based on latest IBM & Google estimates)

  • 1GHz gate speed

  • No decoherence in attack window

This makes the 16.8-second estimate realistic for a sufficiently advanced quantum computer expected in the next 10–15 years.


5. Attack Scenario

Suppose Alice signs a Bitcoin transaction and broadcasts it:

  • Attacker captures public key and signature from mempool.

  • Within ~17 seconds, attacker derives Alice’s private key using Shor’s algorithm.

  • Attacker re-signs and rebroadcasts a fraudulent transaction before Alice's is mined.


6. Conclusion

We rigorously estimate that Bitcoin’s ECDSA layer could be broken in approximately 17 seconds using Shor’s algorithm on a high-performance quantum computer. SHA-256, though theoretically vulnerable to Grover’s algorithm, remains secure under realistic constraints. These findings stress the urgent need to transition Bitcoin to quantum-resistant digital signature schemes.


References

  1. Shor, P. W. (1997). Polynomial-Time Algorithms for Prime Factorization and Discrete Logarithms on a Quantum Computer.

  2. Grover, L. K. (1996). A Fast Quantum Mechanical Algorithm for Database Search.

  3. Gidney, C., & Ekerå, M. (2019). How to factor 2048-bit RSA integers in 8 hours using 20 million noisy qubits.

  4. Aggarwal, D., Brennen, G. K., Lee, T., Santha, M., & Tomamichel, M. (2017). Quantum attacks on Bitcoin and how to protect against them.

  5. Chen, L. et al. (2016). NIST Report on Post-Quantum Cryptography.

댓글

이 블로그의 인기 게시물

제2차 분석보고서: 위장 시설 메커니즘 및 피해자 신원·규모 정밀 추적

CLASSIFIED TECHNICAL DISSERTATION: ENDOCRINE MANIPULATION PROTOCOLS

CRITICAL HUMAN RIGHTS REVIEW: COERCIVE CONFINEMENT SYSTEMS